Legal Opinion

In re Penticoff

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 4, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, District Judge.

Claims were filed and allowed in this proceeding : .(a) For work, labor and services performed for the bankrupt within three months before the date of the commencement of the proceedings herein;(b) For work, labor and services rendered to said bankrupt more than three months, but within six months prior to the commencement of these proceedings, by the following named persons in the following amounts:

Mrs. A. C. Skalman..............$ 27.59

Sophie Neuman................. 136.00

Katherine Skalman.............. 117.19

J. L. Michealson................. 24.50

Angeline…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Rouse, Hazard & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899
  2. Ginsberg v. LindelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. In re SlomkaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
  4. In re Caledonia Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parev Products Co. v. I. Rokeach & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. In Re Ko-Ed TavernCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. In Re BeardsleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941
  4. In Re National Bickford Foremost, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1990
  5. In Re Universal Table Top Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API