Brogden v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
The prosecution in this case was begun under the provisions of a local act, wherein prosecutions for misdemeanor may be instituted on affidavit sworn to before the Clerk of the Circuit Court. Local Acts of Alabama 1927, p. 64.
The offense charged was for the violation of Section 95, Title 3, Code of Alabama 1940. Said statute reads as follows: “Sec. 95. Permitting live stock to run at large in stock law districts, penalty for.— Any person or persons owning or having the possession, custody or control of any live stock, who unlawfully and knowingly permit the same to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hembree v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Ham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
- Davidson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Ex parte Dickey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Koger v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
- Higdon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Ingle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Brogden v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947