Ex parte Dickey v. State

This court is of opinion that the defendant, on his cross-examination of the state’s witness Butler, was entitled to have an answer to his questions as to how much and in what way he had contributed to a fund raised for use in the prosecution of the pending charge against defendant, and that a denial of that right would have been reversible error. However, the court finds, upon petitioner’s statement of what occurred at the trial, that the witness denied making any contribution directly to the fund in question stating, in effect, that he had agreed to reimburse the municipality — which it…