Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martinez v. CR Davis Contracting Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1964No. 7286Published

1DissentNoble, Justice

I am unable to agree that the evidence substantially supports a finding of breach of a legal duty owing by defendant contractor to decedent.

It must be noted at the outset that in New Mexico it is established that the attractive nuisance doctrine will not be extended to include ponds, pools and other natural or artificial bodies of water, ditches or canals. Mellas v. Lowdermilk, 58 N.M. 363, 271 P.2d 399. The majority point to the fact that decedent and his companion boarded what appeared to be a raft, but was actually a cement form, floating on the water of the excavation, from which decedent…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hewison v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
  2. Beeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Reed v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Foster & Creighton Co. v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  5. Hay v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API