Legal Opinion

Firs Home Owners Association v. City of SeaTac

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 21, 2022No. 2:19-cv-01130Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 FIRS HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Cause No. C19-1130RSL 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN 9 v. PART DEFENDANT’S 10 MOTION FOR SUMMARY CITY OF SEATAC, JUDGMENT 11 Defendant. 12 13 This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant’s Rule 56(c) Motion for Summary 14 15 Judgment.” Dkt. # 92. Under SeaTac Municipal Code (“SMC”) § 15.465.600(H)(2)(k), the 16 owner of property on which a mobile home park is located may close the park only after he or 17 she has implemented a “relocation plan” that has been approved by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. City of Pomona v. Sqm North America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API