Legal Opinion

Scarborough v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, Presiding Justice.

The amendment to the plaintiffs’ petition, filed after the judgment which this court, rendered (Smith v. Scarborough, 182 Ga. 157, 185 S. E. 105), and before that judgment was made the judgment of the trial court, did not in any material or substantial particular change the character of that petition. This being so, the question now presented, so far as it relates to the controversy between the plaintiffs and the defendant who demurred to their petition, is the same as that which this court has already passed upon and adjudicated. Byrom v. Gunn, 111 Ga. 805 (35 S. E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Byrom v. GunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Edwards v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. American Surety Company v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  4. American Surety Company v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Ivey v. MaguireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API