Smith v. Scarborough
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
In Medlin v. Downing Lumber Co., 128 Ga. 115 (57 S. E. 232), it was said: "The court of ordinary is a court of general jurisdiction; and unless the want of jurisdiction appears on the face of the record, its judgments can not be collaterally attacked. . . Want of jurisdiction in the court of ordi*159nary to grant letters of administration is not shown by the allegations of an application therefor reciting the death of the decedent sidy-eight years before the filing of the application by a resident of the State, that the decedent, at the time of his death, resided in the county…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Stuckey v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Davie v. McDanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Wash v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Barclay v. KimseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Swofford v. GlazeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Scarborough v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Columbian Mutual Life Insurance v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Campbell v. Atlanta Coach Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Simpson v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.