Legal Opinion

Smith v. Scarborough

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1936No. 10734PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

In Medlin v. Downing Lumber Co., 128 Ga. 115 (57 S. E. 232), it was said: "The court of ordinary is a court of general jurisdiction; and unless the want of jurisdiction appears on the face of the record, its judgments can not be collaterally attacked. . . Want of jurisdiction in the court of ordi*159nary to grant letters of administration is not shown by the allegations of an application therefor reciting the death of the decedent sidy-eight years before the filing of the application by a resident of the State, that the decedent, at the time of his death, resided in the county…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Stuckey v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Davie v. McDanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Wash v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  5. Barclay v. KimseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Swofford v. GlazeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Scarborough v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Columbian Mutual Life Insurance v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Campbell v. Atlanta Coach Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Simpson v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API