Legal Opinion

Kirschbaum v. Village of Homer Glen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 11, 2006No. 3-04-0794PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDADE

On appeal, plaintiff driver attempts to show the order of the Will County circuit court granting defendants’ motion to dismiss was improper because defendants owed plaintiff a duty to prevent trees and brush from obstructing her view of oncoming traffic. The resolution of plaintiffs claim requires the examination of three issues: (1) whether section 3 — 102(a) of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Act) (745 ILCS 10/3 — 102(a) (West 2002)) imposes a duty upon defendants to trim or remove obstructive trees, shrubbery and foliage from defendants’ street…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Merlo v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Weatherman v. Gary-Wheaton Bank of Fox Valley, N.A.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. First National Bank v. City of AuroraIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Boylan v. MartindaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Wallace v. SmythIllinois Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Janowiak v. TiesiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. Martinelli v. The City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. Perfetti v. Marion County, IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API