Legal Opinion

Neal v. Field

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Evidence. Verdict. Practice in Supreme Court. Arbitration and Award. Before Judge Fain. Bartow Superior Court. July Term, 1881. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Speer, Justice.

E. E. Field, commenced his action of complainant on account against the intestate of plaintiff in error,in 1870,to recover certain sums of money, which he alleged to be due him, first, on account of sales of certain lands which the parties had purchased at sheriff’s sale, and on the agreement that they were, thereafter, to be sold privately and the proceeds divided pro rata between them. Second, to recover also the pro rata share of the plaintiff below in certain amounts of insurance which Tumlin had collected, arising from the insurance, and burning of certain mill property…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moody v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  2. Lockett v. MimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  3. Hudson v. HowlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Week v. Big Bunker Hill Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Harte v. CastetterNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Harden v. DrostCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Gibbs v. GibbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Millsaps v. Strange Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API