Legal Opinion

Shannon v. Hearity

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided May 28, 1992No. 91-813PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SACKETT, Judge.

This is an appeal from a directed verdict in a legal malpractice action. The issue is whether the trial court was correct in finding there was not substantial evidence to support a finding the plaintiffs suffered damages as a result of the attorney’s alleged negligence. Plaintiffs did not introduce substantial evidence to support a finding they were damaged. We affirm the trial court.

Plaintiffs-appellants Bernadine Shannon and Roger Tempus and Tempus-Shannon Partnership were engaged in grain and dairy farming. Plaintiffs were experiencing financial difficulties in early 1980.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lakota Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Havey Fund-Raising Management, Inc., and Francis P. HaveyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Northrup v. Miles Homes, Inc. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Larsen v. United Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. Robinson v. Perpetual Services Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  5. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.(Arwell Div.) v. BurnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benton v. NelsenCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1993
  2. Quad City Bank & Trust, plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant v. Elderkin & Pirnie, P.L.C., defendant-appellant/cross-appellee.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API