Legal Opinion

United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ahmed

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 8, 2016No. Civil No. 3:15cv675 (JBA)Published

1Opinion of the Court

RULING DENYING RELIEF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS IN THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Janet Bond Arterton, U.S.D.J.

Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) brought this civil- enforcement action against Defendant .'Iftikar Ahmed (“Mr. Ahmed”) alleging fraud in the purchase or sale of securities in violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 (Count One); fraud in the offer or sale of 'securities in violation of Section -17(a) of the-Securities Act (Count Two); fraud by an Investment Adviser in violation of-Sections 206(1) and 206(2)…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Greenwich CollieriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Kaley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API