Legal Opinion

Byrne v. Brooklyn City & Newtown R. Co.

New York City Court

Decided November 15, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an order striking out certain items of a bill of costs.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborne, J.

This case first came on for trial on February 9, 1893, and a jury having been impaneled and the case opened on behalf of the plaintiff, defendant asked leave to withdraw a juror on the ground of surprise; after argument, the application was granted on the condition and stipulation that the defendant “ pay to plaintiff or her attorney all the costs and disbursements in the action to date,” to be taxed by the clerk; said costs and disbursements were duly taxed and were paid by defendant. In the costs were included the following items: “ Before notice of trial, $25; after notice, $15 ; trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cohu v. HussonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1885
  2. Lennon v. MacIntoshCity of New York Municipal Court · 1887
  3. Andrews v. CrossNew York Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Dovale v. AckermanNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Skinner v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steinhofel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API