Los Angeles Unified School District v. Great American Insurance
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
We have long recognized that “[a] contractor of public works who, acting reasonably, is misled by incorrect plans and specifications issued by the public authorities as the basis for bids and who, as a result, submits a bid which is lower than he would have otherwise made may recover in a contract action for extra work or expenses necessitated by the conditions being other than as represented.” (Souza & McCue Constr. Co. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 508, 510 [20 Cal.Rptr. 634, 370 P.2d 338].) In this case we decide whether a contractor may also recover when the plans…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Small v. Fritz Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Linear Technology Corp. v. Applied Materials, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- San Mateo Union High School District v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Swafford v. Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Guidiville Rancheria v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- G. Voskanian Construction, Inc. v. Alhambra Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Atlas Allied v. San Diego Community College Dist. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.