Legal Opinion
Stickney v. MUHLENBERG COLL. TIAA-CREF RET. PLAN
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 3, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 94-4759PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
896 F.Supp. 412 (1995)
Lisa Nassar STICKNEY and George J. Nassar, Plaintiffs,
v.
MUHLENBERG COLLEGE TIAA-CREF RETIREMENT PLAN, Defendant,
v.
Hiyam N. NASSAR, Counterclaim/Interpleader Defendant.
Civ. A. No. 94-4759.
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
August 3, 1995.
R. Michael Carr, LaBrum & Doak, Bethlehem, PA, for plaintiffs.
Mary Kay Brown, Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corp., Philadelphia, PA, for Muhlenberg.
Gerald M. Barr, Barr & McGogney, Allentown, PA, for Hiyam Nassar.
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are plaintiffs Lisa Nassar Stickney…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ablamis v. RoperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Riley v. WirthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chester Holdings, Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- In Re Estate of GolasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. BernardoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Alkhafaji v. TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013