Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. French

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2004No. S-02-738PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.

NATURE OF CASE

The issue presented in this case is whether the district court erred under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-358(1) (Cum. Supp. 2002) when it ordered Douglas County to pay a portion of the guardian ad litem fees on behalf of one of the parties to the action without finding that the party was indigent. We hold that it was error and reverse, and remand with directions.

BACKGROUND

On December 28, 2000, Thomas S. Mitchell, Jr., initiated this action in the district court for Douglas County against Nikki A. French. Mitchell’s operative petition alleged that he was the father of two minor children…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Unisys Corp. v. Nebraska Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Mathews v. MathewsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Cox v. HendricksNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Riederer v. SiciunasNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Ross v. JacobsNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mogensen v. Board of SupervisorsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. 24TH & DODGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. Acceptance Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. White v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. 24th & Dodge Ltd. Partnership v. Acceptance InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Charleen J. v. Blake O.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API