Legal Opinion

Schrum v. Catawba Upholstering Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1938PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.

Tbe claimant, at tbe time be suffered an injury by accident arising out of and in tbe course of employment which resulted in total destruction of vision of bis right eye, was suffering from astigmatism of said eye, which caused a forty per cent uncorrected loss of vision. By tbe use of proper glasses bis vision was from ninety to one hundred per cent normal.

Tbe bearing Commissioner found tbat “tbe accident destroyed tbe source and substance of vision, tbat which tbe claimant possessed and which enabled him to establish a vision close to normal which cannot be established in any part by tbe…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hollman v. City of Raleigh, Public Utilities DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Pruitt v. Knight Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Pruitt v. KNIGHT PUBLISHING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Walsh Construction Co. v. LondonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  5. McCullough v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API