Legal Opinion
Armak-Akzona v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 4, 1992No. 1589 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGINLEY, Judge.
This is a petition for review by Armak-Akzona (Employer) of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referee’s decision to grant Florence Naylor (Claimant) fatal claim benefits for the death of her husband Mahlon Naylor (Decedent) due to an occupational disease.
The Employer raises a sole issue in this appeal: whether Claimant has met her burden of proving exposure of Decedent to the occupational hazard of asbestos after June 30, 1973, as required by Section 301(c)(2) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peak v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Beissel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Murphy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Kusenko v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Six L'S Packing Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- LeDonne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- BC Food Market v. WCAB (S. Mahar-Ullah and UEGF)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994