Legal Opinion

State v. Garibaldi

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 6, 2007No. A06-116PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge. *

Appellant challenges his conviction for felony test refusal, arguing that the district court did not obtain an adequate waiver from him of his right to counsel before proceeding with a bench trial on stipulated facts. Appellant argues that a written waiver of the right to counsel was required and that a comprehensive inquiry on the record did not occur. Appellant also argues that the district court erred by allowing private counsel who had already filed a certificate of representation to withdraw without making any appearance in court or filing a motion. Because the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. State v. WorthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RhoadsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  2. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Michael BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  3. State v. HagginsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API