State v. Garibaldi
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge. *
Appellant challenges his conviction for felony test refusal, arguing that the district court did not obtain an adequate waiver from him of his right to counsel before proceeding with a bench trial on stipulated facts. Appellant argues that a written waiver of the right to counsel was required and that a comprehensive inquiry on the record did not occur. Appellant also argues that the district court erred by allowing private counsel who had already filed a certificate of representation to withdraw without making any appearance in court or filing a motion. Because the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. WorthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RhoadsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Michael BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- State v. HagginsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011