Legal Opinion

Kerpan v. Sandoval County District Attorney's Office

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1988No. 10222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Chief Judge.

Petitioner appeals from the denial of his application for issuance of a writ of mandamus which sought to compel the district attorney to present certain evidence to the Sandoval County grand jury, to control the manner of presentation of evidence before the grand jury, and to conduct a voir dire examination of prospective grand jury members concerning their connection, if any, with Intel Corporation (Intel). On appeal, petitioner contends that the trial court’s refusal to issue the writ was error. We affirm.

Petitioner was notified pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. In re SkolnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Coleman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Subpoena to Ray M. Vargas. Sangre De Cristo Community Mental Health Service, Inc. v. United States of America, Ray M. Vargas v. Santiago Campos, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. The United States of America v. Benjamin Levinson, Franklin Mortgage Corporation, Edward P. Strang, Jr., Ross HowardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. MurdochNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Matter of Grand Jury Sandoval CountyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State v. HewittNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API