Legal Opinion

Herreid v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1916No. File No. 4026PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from 'Circuit Court, Roberts' -County. Hon. Ti-iomas L. Bouck, Judge. Action by Albert HeunreSdl and wife, against th-e Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway 'Company, 'to- 'recover damages incidental to- use of -a -railroad niglht-of-way. Erom an order overruling a demurrer to the- complaint, defend-aat appeals. Appellant cited; Earlo-w v. -Chambers, 21 S. D. 128; McGee v. Verity, (Mo.) 71 S. W. 472; Bostw-iclc v. Mutual Life Ins.

Read the full summary

Appeal from 'Circuit Court, Roberts' -County. Hon. Ti-iomas L. Bouck, Judge. Action by Albert HeunreSdl and wife, against th-e Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway 'Company, 'to- 'recover damages incidental to- use of -a -railroad niglht-of-way. Erom an order overruling a demurrer to the- complaint, defend-aat appeals. Appellant cited; Earlo-w v. -Chambers, 21 S. D. 128; McGee v. Verity, (Mo.) 71 S. W. 472; Bostw-iclc v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., (W'is.) 92 N. W. 246; 'Commissioners v. Younger, 29 Cal. 172; Wallace v. Railway Co., (Iowa) 25 N. W. 772; Hazard v. Griswold, 2-i Fed. 178, 9 'Cyc.…

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.

This appeal i-s from an order overruling a demurrer to the -complaint. Plaintiffs seek to- recover damages which th-ey claim to have suffered- (owing -to- defendant’s running its right of way -across their land -and, by excavating for same, cutting off the -supply -of water feeding a valuable spring. Antici-*69pat-ing a 'defense, plaintiffs allege that 'they executed a deed to the right of way, which, deed contains a release of damages, 'broad enough in its terms to 'release the damages now sought to he recovered; ’and -plaintiffs allege that prior to executing such deed ■plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Western Manufacturing Co. v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Maxfield v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Wilcox v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Hale v. HaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Shook v. Puritan Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. HouckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lanz v. NaddyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. Van RuschenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Rosholt v. WoulphSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Lanz v. NaddyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API