Lucas v. Blaine
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLemert, J.
Sec 6447, GC, provides and authorizes an appeal in cases similar to the instant case, Wherein it makes provision for a finding as to whether or not:
1. Is the improvement necessary?
2. Will the improvement be conducive to the public welfare?
V Is the cost of the improvement greater than the benefits conferred?
4. Is the route, termini, or the mode of construction the best to accomplish the purpose of the improvement?
5. Are the assessments levied according to the benefits?
6. Is the award for compensation or damages just?
Trial was had upon the issues as thus made by the statute and the case was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Rogers v. Johnson, TreasOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
- Blaine v. LucasOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bartick v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Pelton v. Board of County Commissioners of Wood Co.Wood County Court of Common Pleas · 1937