Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Wartenhorst v. State

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1973No. File 11063Published

1DissentDoyle, Justice

In Security National Bank v. Twinde, 1928, 52 S.D. 352, 217 N.W. 542, this court said:

“We think the word ‘erroneously,’ as used in subdivision 5 of section 6813, must be taken in its ordinary sense of ‘mistakenly.’ There was no error or mistake in the payment made by the plaintiff. It paid the very tax and the amount of tax that it intended to pay; nor was there any error in noting the payment or in issuing the receipt. In our view, the words ‘erroneously paid’ were *548clearly intended to cover cases where payment was made under a misapprehension as to what was being paid. But a tax…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Security National Bank v. TwindeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State Ex Rel. Widdoss v. EsmaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Forward Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Shea v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In Re Estate of GrimesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API