Legal Opinion

Vanderbeck v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 14, 1930No. 39752PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The story leading up to the alleged ejection is brief. At 2 A.M., July 31, 1928, the plaintiff boarded the passenger train of the defendant at Yankton, South Dakota, being bound for Vermilion, 27 miles distant. He was due to arrive at Vermilion at 2:45 A.M. After seating himself in the ear, he quickly fell asleep. The conductor of the train occupied the seat across the aisle from him. The train arrived and stopped in due time at Vermilion, but the plaintiff was not awakened, and did not, therefore, leave the train during such stop. After the train had started from the station, the conductor…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nunn v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  2. Bass v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WimmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Forbes v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Gilkerson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fanelli v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  2. Fanelli v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API