Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fanelli v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 8, 1955No. 48637Published

1DissentMulroney, J.

(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent. As I read the majority opinion it holds the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, fails to make out a prima-facie case of slight negligence. It goes on to hold plaintiff also failed to establish a prima-facie ease of proximate cause. I feel the evidence here sufficient to make out a prima-facie case on both issues.

I. I would hold a prima-facie ease of slight negligence was established by the evidence of wet slippery steps and the evidence of failure to assist plaintiff who was required to use them to get off of the train. We must…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. George v. Iowa & Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  3. McGovern v. Inter Urban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. San Antonio Traction Co. v. FloryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Wisdom v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API