Sharp v. Autry
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
The evidence as admitted, regardless of that excluded, tended to prove the case as laid, and the court therefore erred in ordering a nonsuit. Kelly v. Strouse, 116 Ga. 872 (4, b) (43 S. E. 280); Evans v. Josephine Mills, 119 Ga. 448 (46 S. E. 674).
The first assignment of error on the rejection of evidence was as follows: “The plaintiffs offered in evidence the testimony of Gene Goswick, but the court excluded said evidence. What occurred in connection therewith was as follows: ‘ Mr. Lang: If your honor please, I would like to prove by Mr. Eugene Goswick that Mr. Jim Sharp showed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Evans v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Wallace v. MizeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Blakely Oil & Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Dozier v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vatacs Group, Inc. v. U. S. Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Jefferson Pilot Fire & Casualty Co. v. PrickettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Latham v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Gulf Life Insurance Co. v. BelchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Rosshirt v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.