Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Autry

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 5, 1937No. 11950PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

The evidence as admitted, regardless of that excluded, tended to prove the case as laid, and the court therefore erred in ordering a nonsuit. Kelly v. Strouse, 116 Ga. 872 (4, b) (43 S. E. 280); Evans v. Josephine Mills, 119 Ga. 448 (46 S. E. 674).

The first assignment of error on the rejection of evidence was as follows: “The plaintiffs offered in evidence the testimony of Gene Goswick, but the court excluded said evidence. What occurred in connection therewith was as follows: ‘ Mr. Lang: If your honor please, I would like to prove by Mr. Eugene Goswick that Mr. Jim Sharp showed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Evans v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Wallace v. MizeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Blakely Oil & Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Dozier v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vatacs Group, Inc. v. U. S. Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Jefferson Pilot Fire & Casualty Co. v. PrickettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Latham v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Gulf Life Insurance Co. v. BelchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Rosshirt v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API