Hansis v. Brougham
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The defendant does not argue here that the court has no jurisdiction of the person or subject of the action. We find no difficulty in making the dogmatic statement that the county court has jurisdiction in both respects.
Defendant’s contention that the petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against him rests on his assertion that sec. 52.01 (4), Stats., under which the proceeding is brought, is unconstitutional. The statute is as follows:
“Liability of relatives; enforcement. (1) The parent, spouse, and child of any dependent person (as defined in sec. 49.01)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mallatt v. LUIHNOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Manthey v. SchuelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Duffy v. YordiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Wood Et Ux. v. WheatCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Green Lake County Department of Public Welfare v. HenningerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by6 opinions
- Whitwam v. WhitwamCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
- Gluckman v. GainesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Lister v. SheridanNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Groover v. Essex County Welfare BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Ponath v. HedrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.