Legal Opinion

Unknown Party v. Arizona Board of Regents

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 4, 2021No. 2:18-cv-01623Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Unknown Party, No. CV-18-01623-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Arizona Board of Regents, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 INTRODUCTION 16 In February 2021, Plaintiff John Doe (“Doe”) served a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition 17 notice on Defendant Arizona Board of Regents (“ABOR”). (Doc. 141-2 at 65-69.) The 18 notice lists 19 examination topics. (Id.) Since then, the parties have engaged in extensive 19 meet-and-confer efforts concerning ABOR’s objections to some of the noticed topics. 20 After those…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Stevens v. Corelogic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. In the Matter of Elaine B. Fischel, Contemner-Appellant. United States of America v. Harry MargolisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. QBE Insurance v. Jorda Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API