Legal Opinion
Tardiff v. County of Knox
District Court, D. Maine
Decided November 1, 2007No. 07-10-P-HPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO *67COMPEL1
DAVID M. COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The defendants have moved to compel three individuals to answer certain questions posed to them (or to be posed to them) at deposition. I grant the motion in part.
The history of this case is familiar and I will not recite it here. For present purposes, it suffices to say that the plaintiff in this action formerly served as the class representative in an action against Knox County and its sheriff which began on November 19, 2002 and ended with Judge Carter’s approval of a class settlement…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation. Petition of the Plaintiffs' Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Maine v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Rutgard v. HaynesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 1611 Cold Spring Road Operating Company, LLC v. SkinnerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023