State v. Casteel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendants were charged with conspiracy and with possession, manufacturing and delivery of controlled substances. The trial court granted defendants’ motions to suppress tape recordings of conversations that they had with a police informant, because the investigating officers had not obtained an order authorizing their use of a body wire to record the conversations. The state appeals. ORS 138.060(3). We reverse.
The trial court conducted a stipulated facts hearing on defendants’ motions to suppress. In the summer of 1990, the Prineville Police Department coordinated an interagency drug…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. NielsenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. FleetwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. BassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994