Legal Opinion

Celli v. New York City

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 8, 2025No. 1:24-cv-09743Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Denied. A plaintiff has 90 days to s 2024-cv-09743 defendants and the court must extend : time if good cause is shown. Fed. R. Lucio Celli, P. 4(m). Plaintiff filed this actior Plaintiff, December 18, 2024. Plaintiff has had than 140 days to serve defendants. Ple V. has not shown good cause for any r time to do so. New York City et al, SO ORDERED: Defendants. 0/08/2028 /—— HON. ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MOTION TO DEFER DISMISSAL Until ALL Defendants have Answered And/OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR EXTENSION OF…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Jeffes v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Shanghai Automation Instrument Co., Ltd. v. KueiDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API