Legal Opinion

Manuel v. Ardoin

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1943No. 2592PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this suit the plaintiff, Walter Manuel, seeks to recover damages from the defendant, Roy Ardoin, in the sum of $400, for what is alleged in his petition to have been an illegal, unwarranted and unprovoked attack upon his person.

He avers that on the night of Saturday, August 1, 1943, at about 11 o'clock, he was in a place known as the Old Owl Saloon, operated by Mack Aucoin, and which is situated just west of the corporate limits of the Town of Ville Platte; that he was there attending to his own business, in a quiet and peaceful manner, not disturbing anyone, and while standing at the bar,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caspar v. ProsdameSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  2. Landry v. HimelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Capdevielle v. ChristinaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Hitchcock v. NorthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morneau v. American Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Smith v. ParkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Ponthieu v. CocoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Smith v. BankstonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Gordon v. PittmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API