Legal Opinion

Glynn v. Le Normand

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1955No. 4004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIS, Judge.

This is a suit for malicious prosecution which resulted from a boundary dispute between plaintiff and defendant. This case and the boundary suit between the same parties were tried together and the facts in the latter record are to be used in arriving at a decision herein.

The trial of the case resulted in a judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s suit, from which plaintiff has appealed.

It is shown that on June 20, 1946 the defendant charged the plaintiff with “trespassing on her property by driving his car on her driveway and refusing to remove same. He continues to trespass after…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eusant v. Unity Industrial Life Ins., Etc., Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Sandoz v. VeazieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Staub v. Van BenthuysenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  4. Wagner v. ShannonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  5. Graham v. Interstate Electric Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Brown & Root, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1971
  2. Beasley v. NunnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API