Legal Opinion

Keller v. Honeywell Protective Services

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 31, 1990No. C88-153PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BATTISTI, District Judge.

Before the merits of this removed diversity case can be addressed, this Court must examine the basis for subject matter jurisdiction. 1 See Gross v. Hougland, 712 F.2d 1034, 1036 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1025, 104 S.Ct. 1281, 79 L.Ed.2d 684 (1984) (A federal court “must satisfy itself that it has subject matter jurisdiction over the dispute before it addresses the merits of the claims”); Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3). Because Defendants have not met their burden of affirmatively and clearly demonstrating that removal is proper, pursuant to 28…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  4. Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Pennymac Loan Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  2. Roberson v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
  3. Wright v. Sterling Investors Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1990
  4. Taylor v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. United States Fire Insurance v. United Church of ChristDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API