State v. Branham
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPieper, J.
Appellant Charles Brandon Branham was convicted of driving under the influence, first offense, following a jury trial in the magistrate’s court. The circuit court affirmed the magis trate’s refusal to dismiss the case due to the State’s failure to provide Branham with a videotape of his breath alcohol analysis test (breath test). On appeal, Branham argues the court must dismiss his conviction because the State did not produce the videotape. We affirm. 1
FACTS
Trooper K.G. Ginn of the South Carolina Highway Patrol arrested Branham for suspicion of driving under the influence. A breath test was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Jones v. LottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- United States v. David DriverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- City of Rock Hill v. SuchenskiSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- State v. ElwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- State v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- State v. Phillip W. LowerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2024