Legal Opinion

State v. Branham

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 2, 2011No. 4803PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPieper, J.

Appellant Charles Brandon Branham was convicted of driving under the influence, first offense, following a jury trial in the magistrate’s court. The circuit court affirmed the magis trate’s refusal to dismiss the case due to the State’s failure to provide Branham with a videotape of his breath alcohol analysis test (breath test). On appeal, Branham argues the court must dismiss his conviction because the State did not produce the videotape. We affirm. 1

FACTS

Trooper K.G. Ginn of the South Carolina Highway Patrol arrested Branham for suspicion of driving under the influence. A breath test was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Jones v. LottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. United States v. David DriverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. City of Rock Hill v. SuchenskiSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. ElwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  4. State v. Phillip W. LowerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API