Legal Opinion
Fowler v. Minehart
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 6, 2013No. SD 32644PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jerry Minehart (“Minehart”) appeals from an “Order/Judgment” granting Timothy Fowler (“Fowler”)1 a “Full Order of Protection” against Minehart, pursuant to the Adult Abuse Act, after a bench trial. Minehart contends Fowler failed to prove all the elements of “stalking” as defined in sections 455.010-.0902 to support the trial court’s issuance of a Full Order of Protection. We agree and reverse.
Factual Procedural Background
Fowler filed an “Adult Abuse/Stalking Petition for Order of Protection” (“Petition”) on January 22, 2013, against Mine-hart. Fowler worked with Minehart’s wife at the Dexter…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Wallace v. Van PeltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- United States v. Robert F. LippmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Schwalm v. SchwalmMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Binggeli v. HammondMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- M.S. v. N.M.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Craig Herrington v. Medevac Medical Response, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Stephanie Kim Smith v. Kole Ryan McAdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- L.M.D. v. D.W.D.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- TIFFANI AUSTIN, Petitioner-Respondent v. LARRY JARREDMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.