Legal Opinion

Craig Herrington v. Medevac Medical Response, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 2014No. WD75618PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS H. NEWTON, Judge.

Summary

Medevac Medical Response, Inc. (Mede-vac) appeals for a new trial, based upon the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on comparative fault and submission of a negligence claim for failure to keep a careful lookout. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

In 2009, Mr. Craig Herrington was a locomotive engineer for Amtrak, with a railroad career that spanned more than 30 years. His route ran between St. Louis, Missouri, and Kansas City, Missouri. On occasion, track repair prevented trains from completing the trip, so westbound crew and passengers would…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fleshner v. Pepose Vision Institute, P.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. Hayes v. PriceSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  3. Marion v. MarcusMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Euton v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Fowler v. MinehartMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas Host v. BNSF Railway CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Tanisha Ross-Paige v. Saint Louis Metropolitan Police Department Steven A. Gori, Michael A. Deeba, Sr., Saint Louis Board of Police Commissioners, Richard H. Gray, Bettye Battle Turner, Thomas J. Irwin, and Francis G. SlaySupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  3. Katherine Harned v. Daniel V. Spurlock, D.O.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Lauritsen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API