Legal Opinion
(PS) Schmitz v. Asman
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 16, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00195Unknown
1Opinion
Case 2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD Document 85 Filed 11/16/20 Page 1 of 47 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD PS 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 A. ASMAN, et al., (ECF Nos. 63, 64) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the court are defendants’ motions to partially dismiss the Second 18 Amended Complaint (ECF No. 44), to which plaintiffs have responded and defendants have 19 replied.1 (ECF Nos. 63, 64, 65, 68, 70, 75, 76-79.) These motions were taken under…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.