Legal Opinion
Alfred v. Mentor Corp.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 22, 2007No. CIV.A. 05-483-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
COFFMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion to exclude the testimony of Pierre Blais, Ph.D., pursuant to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (DE 26). The court, having reviewed the record and being otherwise advised, will grant the motion to exclude.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiff in this matter claims that she suffered bodily injury, medical expenses, and other damages associated with the replacement of certain allegedly defective breast implants designed and produced by the defendant. More specifically, she claims that expert analysis of her…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In Re Breast Implant LitigationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Grant v. Bristol-Myers SquibbDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2000
- Giddings v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brock v. Positive Changes Hypnosis, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2008