Ehrlich v. Sklamberg
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendants from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of ISTcw York, second district, borough of Manhattan.
1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.
This is an action upon an undertaking. The plaintiff brought an action against one Rinzler and in that action obtained a warrant of attachment under which the property therein described was seized by a marshal of the Municipal Court. The defendant Salman, claiming to be the owner of this property, signed with his codefendant an *6undertaking which contained the following clause: “ that if in an action upon the bond commenced within.three months thereafter the said claimant, Sam Salman, will establish that he was the general owner of the property claimed at the time of seizure; or if he fails so…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Toles v. . AdeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Haywood v. TownsendAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Goldstein v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cohen v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1928
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930