Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Estell

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874No. 3,422PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the District Court,.Tenth Judicial District^ County of Colusa. The contract-spoken of in the opinion was a parol one. The defendant recovered judgment, and the plaintiff appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Rhodes, J.:

The plaintiff and Stewart entered into an agreement to the effect that the plaintiff," who was then County Surveyor of Colusa County, would search out -and fmd in that county a quantity of swamp and overflowed land, survey the same, and assist Stewart in effecting a purchase of it from the State; that Stewart would make the affidavit and application to purchase, and make the first payment "of twenty per cent., and the first year’s interest on’ the balance; procure a certificate of purchase, and then would convey one half "of" the land to the plaintiff. The" plaintiff…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Cooper v. ColsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  4. Puterbaugh v. PuterbaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Cheney v. UnroeIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API