Legal Opinion
Powers v. Eichen
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 15, 1997No. Civil 96-1431 B AJBPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash
BATTAGLIA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash came on regularly for hearing on April 14,1997 at 9:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Anthony J. Battaglia. Bill Grauer appeared on behalf of all defendants; Jan Adler, Sallie Blackman, and Jennifers Wells appeared on behalf of plaintiff. On behalf of all purchasers of the common stock of Próxima Corporation (“Próxima”), plaintiffs’ allege that defendants violated federal securities laws by making false and misleading…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,072 Harry Lewis v. William H. McAdam Sears, Roebuck and Co., and Sears Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by12 opinions
- Faulkner v. Verizon Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- King v. Livent, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- In Re Carnegie International Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- In Re Lernout & Hauspie Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Mori v. SaitoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.