Herrington & Co. v. Shumate Razor Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari, from Gwinnett superior court — Judge Brand. June 7, 1909.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
On tbe hearing in the court below the judge overruled the certiorari; and exception is taken to this judgment. The single error assigned in the petition for certiorari is that the verdict is contrary to law> in that it is without evidence to support it. Upon a review of the record as it appears in the answer of the magistrate, we find that the Shumate Razor Company brought suit against' Herrington & Company upon an open account for certain merchandise alleged to have been sold to that partnership. It is undisputed that the partnership, is composed of W. E. Herrington and Lizzie Herrington.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eastlick v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Suttles v. SewellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Claflin & Co. v. BallanceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carroll v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Akridge v. Atlanta Journal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Gordy Tire Company v. BulmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Bacon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Bailey v. NewberryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.