People v. Lagunas
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
—By statute, a trial court may grant a new trial “[w]hen the verdict or finding is contrary to law or evidence”; if, however, the evidence shows that the defendant is guilty only of a lesser offense necessarily included in the crime charged, the court may modify the verdict or judgment accordingly. (Pen. Code, § 1181, subd. 6.) Here, the Court of Appeal held that, even though not authorized by statute, a trial court also has the power to modify a verdict to a lesser related offense based on principles of due process. We disagree.
I
In a prosecution for residential burglary (§§…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- People v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. StatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.