Legal Opinion

People v. Lagunas

California Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1994No. S032503PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

—By statute, a trial court may grant a new trial “[w]hen the verdict or finding is contrary to law or evidence”; if, however, the evidence shows that the defendant is guilty only of a lesser offense necessarily included in the crime charged, the court may modify the verdict or judgment accordingly. (Pen. Code, § 1181, subd. 6.) Here, the Court of Appeal held that, even though not authorized by statute, a trial court also has the power to modify a verdict to a lesser related offense based on principles of due process. We disagree.

I

In a prosecution for residential burglary (§§…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. StatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API