Legal Opinion
Amerada Hess Corp. v. Town of Oyster Bay
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 23, 2007Published
1Opinion of the Court
*730In a hybrid action for a judgment declaring that a restrictive covenant contained in a declaration of restrictive covenants, dated April 4, 2002, prohibiting the sale of alcoholic beverages in the plaintiffs convenience store is invalid and unenforceable, and a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a resolution of the Town Board of the Town of Oyster Bay, dated October 28, 2003, revoking a special use permit previously issued to the plaintiff, the defendant Town of Oyster Bay appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. De JesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- St. Onge v. DonovanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Lansdown Entertainment Corp. v. New York City Department of Consumer AffairsNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Ferraris v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Old Country Burgers Co. v. Town Board of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.