Legal Opinion
Certain London Market Insurance Companies v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided June 20, 2003No. 1:01 CV 179-D-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIDSON, Chief Judge.
On or about May 4, 2001, Plaintiffs filed their complaint for reimbursement and declaratory relief. Plaintiffs seek a judicial declaration as to Defendant Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company’s (“Penn National”) duties and Plaintiffs’ rights under the Penn National policies. The complaint asserts causes of action for, inter alia, breach of contract against Defendant Penn National. This cause proceeded to a bench trial which concluded on March 24, 2008.
Pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court issues the following…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, England v. James E. Layne Cindy Carol Kilgore, Larry Nig KilgoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Indiana Gas Company, Inc. v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Swift Energy Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Thomas C. SinkovichCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gilbane Building Co. v. Admiral InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Eagle Pacific Ins. Co. v. QuintanillaCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2006
- Roy Anderson Corp. v. Transcontinental InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2005