Legal Opinion

Lyons Transport v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 17, 1956No. C. D. 1783PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

Plaintiff imported from Canada merchandise described as “hard copper square sheared” on the several invoices to which this proceeding relates. The collector of customs classified the merchandise as articles or wares, wholly or in chief value of metal, not specially provided for, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, and imposed duty thereon at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem.

*258By its protest, plaintiff claims that said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Seligmann v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Burgess Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  4. Lunham & Reeve, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  5. Strouse v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sommers Plastic Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API