United States v. Humphries
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1DissentStucky, Judge
Appellee and Cross-Appellant, Senior Airman Humphries, failed to demonstrate that the failure of the adultery specification to allege the terminal element was plain error. I would further hold that the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) was without authority to remand the case to the convening authority with directions to approve a sentence not to exceed what the CCA thought appropriate. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
I. The Specification
The specification in question (Charge II, Specification 1) alleged the following under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.