Legal Opinion

Cappel v. Meeker Sugar Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 3, 1930No. 30012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.

This case comes before us by appeal from a judgment sustaining an exception of no Cause of action. The suit, in which the exception was sustained, is one for judgment against defendant for $10,400, with legal interest thereon from judicial demand, for rents and revenues growing out of the alleged illegal seizure and detention of a plantation.

The petition alleges that on May 23, 1927, in a suit entitled Curry Cappel v. Chester F. Knoll, plaintiff obtained a judgment dissolving. a sale made by him to Knoll on November 22, 1915, of a certain plantation, situated in the parishes of Avoyelles and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gilkerson-Sloss Commission Co. v. Yale & BowlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  2. Kohn v. Mayor of CarrolltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
  3. Succession of PhillipsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  4. Cappel v. HundleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. Louisiana Construction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Transportation Equipment Co. v. Younger Bros.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Campbell v. ScrogginsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Cappel v. Meeker Sugar Refining CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API