Legal Opinion

Eidam v. A. R. C. S. Bldg. & Loan Ass'n

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1932No. Appeal 342PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The action below was assumpsit. Plaintiff sought to recover from the defendant building and loan association the sum of $1,000, alleged to be due him under the terms of a written contract, having for its subject matter an extension of the time fixed for payment of the principal of a certain bond, accompanied by a mortgage on the premises at No. 664 North 11th Street, Philadelphia. Defendant filed an affidavit of defense in lieu of a demurrer; the questions of law-raised thereby were decided against it and a supplemental affidavit to the averments of fact in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fields v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. McMillin v. TitusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Commonwealth v. Nelson-Pedley Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Vulcanite Paving Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Wood v. U. S. Natl. B. & L. Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. Heinel Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Lifter v. Ruth Gordon Building & Loan Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API