Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Gadsden v. Meeks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 2, 1922No. 7 Div. 342PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

Plaintiff in attachment sought to recover rents due her by the tenant in chief, T. J. Nicholson, for the year 1920. The attachment writ was levied upon cotton of subtenants and the First National Bank of Gadsden filed an affidavit and bond—a claim suit for the cotton in question—and demanded a trial by jury, and there was verdict for plaintiff.

At the time the attachment was sued out and levy made, defendant Nicholson, the tenant in chief, had nothing in the way of crops upon which levy could be made. The crop he had raised on the land had been sold by him prior to issuance of the attachment,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lamar v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Warble v. Sulzberger Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Anniston Mfg. Co. v. So. R'y Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Daly v. BrockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. Kendall & Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stephens v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API